Asada Mao (1990-present).
World's No. 1 female figure skater. She is the concrete favorite in Sochi, Russia, 2014, unless IOC, ISU, NBC, Cinquanta, Dore, the Kricks, and judges fix the game, as they did in Vancouver, 2010.
We request that the Court of Arbitration for Sports needs to show accountability in the figure skating scoring system. We also request that ISU Rule 123, paragraph 4 of the ISU General Regulation, Protest restrictions (see attached partial regulation), be removed or changed to allow the protest.
During these past six to seven years, we huge figure skating fans have been seeing numerous incomprehensible scores in many international figure skating competitions.
Do you know a sign that reads “Hi! Slichs” was held by a figure skating fan at the Torino World Championship in 2010? That was a strong protest sign against the judges. Have you heard that at Nice World in 2012, the arena was full of loud booing against the judges from the audience about unfair scoring? At London World in 2013, the audience was totally lost for words what to say about the scores? Many old and huge figure skating fans are very angry about inexplicable scores. Do you have any idea why these things are happening in the figure skating world?
The answer is that the ISU rule 123, paragraph 4 does never allow skaters or coaches to protest against the scores, unless there is a mathematical calculation error and the ISU has no obligation to explain about the process of the scoring or evaluation. This rule cannot be applied without transparency and trust of the judging system. However, what we have been seeing is totally different from what it should be.
Currently, the ISU judging system assures the anonymity of the judges and this enables them to give higher scores to their favorite skaters regardless of their performance on that day, or even a lower score to their unfavorable skaters. Who would hold such “Hi! Sliches” sign or boo loudly against judges if the scores and evaluations of the performances were reasonable. The gap between what the audience saw and the score which the judges gave is too big, and no one explains or no one is “obligated” to explain the reason of such gap. Even the judges are not. That’s because of the ISU Rule 123, paragraph 4. We are no longer able to enjoy watching figure skating as a sport.
A fan, who cannot stand by and watch this situation any longer, called for advocates to protest against the current ISU rule; immediately more than five thousand fans agreed and signed the petition. This fan is not a well-known journalist or figure skating related person, just one of the ordinary figure skating fans. This means many fans doubt the fairness of this scoring system.
We have sent the petition to the Japanese Skating Federation along with a letter to protest against the current judging system and request explanations for incomprehensible scores and results of some international competitions. However, there was no response from the federation at all. Do you know why? It is because of the “Rule 123, paragraph 4”. This rule allows them not to respond or explain anything about the judging system. Or they may not even want to answer our questions because they know what they are doing, and this “what they are doing” is not supposed to be public.
Where can you find any sport like figure skating which has such an unreasonable restricted rule for skaters? Figure skating is only one of the amateur sports. Skaters are trained hard every single day with bloody effort to pursue and show their perfect and best performances in each competition for audiences and themselves, and those performances must be scored and evaluated fairly under a transparent system by quality judges. If not, who wants to buy expensive tickets and travel from great distances to see such competitions beyond figure skating fans’ comprehension?
We would like to ask you the following questions.
1. We are just a group of ordinary figure skating fans. Is it possible for us to file a complaint to the Court of Arbitration for Sports against the ISU for such an unfair judging system?
2. Is it required to hire a lawyer in order to file the complaint?
3. Are we able to file the complaint with only documents and video tapes as the proof?
4. What would be the estimate for the fee to file the case based on the assumptions above?
Honestly, there are many fans who are worried that Japanese skater(s) would receive undeservedly a low score or evaluation on his/her performance at competitions if such complaint would have been filed to the CAS. In order to prevent it, the result of the ruling given by CAS should be publicly announced. We strongly believe that this will work as a deterrent against unfair judging. If the CAS would not accept the complaint, or even though the CAS would accept it with conditions of 1 through 4 mentioned above but wouldn’t be able to change the ISU rule, we expect that the CAS would give us an explanation that can satisfy us.
Even though we asked above if a lawyer is required, we are not planning to hire anyone for this. However, if we can file the complaint, we need to collect fund to do so. We have no sponsor or support from big corporations. We are only fathers, mothers, daughters, sons, workers, farmers, or self-employed, and huge figure skating fans. That’s it. The sports are for such fans, not for corporate sponsors or political instruments.
As you can see already in the U.S. or Canada, figure skating is getting less popular and in the near future, this sport may not be a “sport” anymore.
We greatly appreciate any response or instructions you can provide us. If the fee would be too high for us, we may have to abandon this plan. We have written everything that we huge figure skating fans are concerned about and what we huge figure skating fans are desperate for, and this is the record to remain in the CAS at least what we did for the future of figure skating. All sports should be for the fans, not for the corporate sponsors and not only for one country. Does this make sense to you? Otherwise most competitive sports will disappear from the earth.
We are very much looking forward to hearing from you soon.
Dear President Putin:
I am a fan of figure skating, especially Russian figure skating: Classic, elegant, beautiful, difficulty and pride. My favorites are Evgeni Plushenko, Irina Slutskaya, Adelina Sotnikova of Russia and Mao Asada of Japan. My opinion is that Plushenko should have won in Vancouver in 2010, and Slutskaya should have won in Salt Lake in 2002. I am looking to Sochi in 2014.
As you know, there are many fixed scores (defective scoring system, leniency applied under the table, malicious enforcement of other skaters, and denial of efforts and difficulties) in this sport now. Behind these fixed scores are Ottavio Cinquanta, ISU President and also a member of IOC, David Dore, Vice President of ISU, the Kricks of Germany, South Korea and money from Samson (as you know they are behind IOC, look wrestling), and others. Samson bought judges and almost the entire media from North America, Japan and even Euro Sports. A skater is also a suspicious dope user. You can see South Koreans (organized by the government) attacking Japanese skaters (and their fans) on You Tube, blogs and other social medias.
I am looking for fair, passionate competition in Sochi, not fixed games. We do not want to see it again. Our only hope now is with you. I am writing this letter, but behind me are many skating fans all over Japan.
Our friends are collecting signatures for fair judgments and have recently published a book, called, The Suspicions high scores in figure skating on March 15th, 2013 (ISBN-10: 4862236529/ISBN-13: 978-4862236524).
If we have unfair judgments in Sochi, figure skating will be tarnished again and disappear from the world as it has already from North America.
Please say hello to our Tatiana Tarasova. We called her “Tara-Mama,” and we love her. We are hoping for great success in the Sochi Winter Olympics.